JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 16, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jaime Sgardo Muñoz Alonso Vs. Gobernacion De Cundinamarca Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Sentencia T-458/03
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Carácter excepcional
  • Demostración plena de vulneración del debido proceso
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso
Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Alcance del cambio de jurisprudencia
  • Improcedencia por discrepancias con los argumentos
  • Improcedencia por no existir cambio de jurisprudencia
Juez De Tutela
  • Determinación veracidad de hechos a través de pruebas
4 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se negó la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-458/03 proferida en la tutela presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia, toda vez que no existe violación al debido proceso, ni la citada providencia desconoció la sentencia de tutela T-502/02, ni los argumentos esgrimidos por la peticionaria constituyen causal de nulidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-458 de 2003, proferida en la tutela presentada por el senor Jaime Sgardo Munoz Alonso.
  2. Segundo. Notificar esta decision al peticionario, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.