JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 22, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Florentino Bonilla Lerma

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Indemnizacion De Perjuicios
  • Liquidación del daño emergente
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Inhibición por la Corte Constitucional
Indemnizacion Del Daño Emergente En Abstracto
  • Circunstancias para procedencia excepcional de tutela
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se inhibió de emitir pronunciamiento en relación con el aparente conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Popayán y el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Cauca, toda vez que la Corte consideró improcedente dirimir el aparente conflicto entre los dos despachos judiciales.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. INHIBIRSE de emitir pronunciamiento en relacion con el aparente conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Popayan y el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Cauca.
  2. Copiese, notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.