JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 15, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Piedad Amparo Zuñiga Quintero

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Interpuesto Contra El Auto De Febrero Nueve (9) De 2006 De Rechazo De La Demanda Contra El Artículo 35, Numeral 9 (Parcial) De La Ley 270 De 1996, Por Existir Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Confirma En Su Intergridad El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad De Ley Estatutaria
  • Caso excepcional en que procede nuevo juicio de constitucionalidad por vía de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad
  • Vicios de inconstitucionalidad sobrevinientes
  • Jurisdiccional, automático, integral, definitivo, participativo y previo
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional frente a la ley estatutaria de administración de justicia
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de esta Corporacion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto de febrero nueve (9) de 2006, proferido por el Magistrado sustanciador Jaime Cordoba Trivino, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por la ciudadana Piedad Amparo Zuniga Quintero
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.