Dissenting and concurring opinions by Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Decisions in which Luis filed a dissenting or concurring opinion. 538 in total.
The record of separate opinions is reliable from ~2000. Earlier dissents may be incomplete in the data.
T-976/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-975/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-938A/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-917/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-914/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-868/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-850/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-849/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-791/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-789/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-778/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-759/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-689/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-684/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-625/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-619/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-588B/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-579/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-476/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Opinion text not extracted · see the ruling page →
T-474/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-462A/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-394/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-392A/14Tutela2014Concurring opinion
Read the concurring opinion →
T-384/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Accion De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Improcedencia Por No Cumplir Requisito De Inmediatez Y Subsidiariedad.
Read the dissenting opinion →
T-362/14Tutela2014Dissenting opinion
Read the dissenting opinion →