JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 30, 2001

T-926 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jose Fernando Huertas Peralta Vs Tribunal Superior De Bogota Y Otra·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Derecho A La Igualdad. Valoracion De Pruebas Aportadas. Evaluación De La Solicitud Que Motivó La Expedición De La Certificación Que Dio Lugar A La Condena Del Actor. Se Le Nego El Subrogado De La Ejecución Condicional. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Via De Hecho En Proceso Penal
  • No existió violación del debido proceso y la igualdad al determinar la condena
2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos en segunda y en primera instancia por la Sala Jurisdiccional del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura y por la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca el 7 de diciembre y el 10 de noviembre de 2000 respectivamente.
  2. Segunda.- Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991. Para efectos de la notificacion al actor se comisiona al director de la Carcel Municipal de Cota (Cund.), Casa de Gobierno. Oficiese.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.