JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 24, 2002

T-898 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Aris Serna Bermudez Vs. Batallon Jose Hilario Lopez No. 56

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida De Soldado Profesional Voluntario. Solicitud Prestacion Servicos Medicos. Accidente De Transito Cuando Conducia Moto Dentro De La Institucion. Alta Voluntaria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Y A La Vida
  • No vulneración por cuanto el batallón no ha negado los servicios médicos a soldado
Derecho A La Salud Del Soldado
  • Traslado a otra ciudad por su madre sin autorización del batallón y suspensión de servicios médicos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar el fallo proferido el cuatro (4) de junio de dos mil dos (2002) por el Juzgado Dieciseis Penal del Circuito de Cali, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Aris Serna Bermudez en representacion de su hijo Geovanny Idarraga Serna, en contra del Batallon Jose Hilario Lopez 56 Contraguerrilla.
  2. Segundo. Advertir al Comandante del Batallon Contraguerrilla No. 56 Jose Hilario Lopez, que autorice, una vez lo solicite la demandante, la prestacion de los servicios medicos que el senor Geovanny Idarraga Serna, necesite para su total recuperacion.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.