JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 22, 2000

T-782 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Maria Delcyda Vasquez De Zuleta

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Reconocimiento De Pension De Sobrevivientes A Hija Con Labio Leporino. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Particulares
  • Situaciones que se presentan
Derecho De Peticion
  • Alcance
  • Término para resolver
Seguro Social
  • EPS no puede prestar atención médica a quien no es cotizante ni beneficiario
Derecho De Petición
  • Núcleo esencial
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR PARCIALMENTE el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Cali, el 16 de diciembre de 1999, en la accion de tutela de la referencia, en su lugar TUTELAR el derecho de peticion y ORDENAR a la Gerencia Seccional de Pensiones del ISS, Seccional Valle del Cauca, que, si aun no lo ha hecho, resuelva en el termino de quince dias habiles a partir de la notificacion de esta sentencia, las peticiones que se le han formulado en cuanto a la pension de sobrevivientes del senor Jose Reinel Zuleta Ceballos, teniendo en cuenta el principio de favorabilidad. CONFIRMAR en lo demas la providencia aludida.
  2. Segundo. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.