JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 13, 2002

T-754 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Libinia Sarmiento Casiani Vs. Mutual Ser

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida Persona De La Tercera Edad. Suministro Medicamentos Prescritos Por Medico Tratante No Incluidos En El Pos. Enfermedad Catastrofica O Ruinosa. Agencia Oficiosa. Accion De Repeticion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Repetición contra el FOSYGA
Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Suministro de medicamentos
Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Suministro de medicamentos para aliviar enfermedad
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Civil Municipal de Cartagena el siete (7) de mayo de 2002 en la que se decidio no tutelar los derechos invocados a favor de Miguel Angel Sarmiento Cortes.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la proteccion del derecho a la salud en conexidad con el derecho fundamental a la vida de Miguel Angel Sarmiento Cortes. En consecuencia, ORDENAR a la ARS Mutual Ser que en el termino de 48 horas siguientes a la notificacion del fallo, le suministre los medicamentos prescritos por su medico tratante.
  4. Tercero. AUTORIZAR a la ARS Mutual Ser para que repita contra el FOSYGA por el costo de los medicamentos proporcionados al beneficiario de la tutela de la referencia. El FOSYGA dispondra de quince (15) dias para reconocer lo debido o indicar la fecha maxima dentro de la cual lo hara y, luego, dara cumplimiento a la obligacion reconocida.
  5. Cuarto. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.