JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 20, 2000

T-724 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Aixa Sevigne Murilla Y Otras

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia De La Tutela Para El Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Pago De Primas A Docentes. Medio De Defensa Judidicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Trabajador
  • No afectación por no pago de primas complementarias de salario a educadores
  • Presunción de afectación por ausencia prolongada en pago de salarios
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR los fallos de tutela proferidos por los juzgados: Veintidós Civil Municipal de Medellín (expediente T-289499), Promiscuo de Familia de El Santuario, (Antioquía) (expediente T-289669),
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Medellín (expediente T-290064),
  3. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Medellín (expediente T-290069), Once Civil del Circuito de Medellín (expediente T-290732) y Dieciséis Penal Municipal de Medellín (expediente T-291438), que concedieron el amparo de tutela solicitado. En consecuencia niégase la tutela concedida en los referidos procesos.
  4. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.