JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 28, 2001

T-681 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Aleida Gelves Laguado Vs. Idesa.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Digna Y Salud. Solicitud De Examen Que No Pertenece A La A.R.S. Insuficiencia Cardiaca Requiere De Un Diagnostico Preciso. Falta De Recursos De La Accionante. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Administradora Del Regimen Subisidado
  • Práctica de examen cardiaco
Administradora Del Regimen Subsidiado
  • Sucursal debió recibir notificación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo de tutela proferido por el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Arauca de fecha 06 de diciembre de 2000 en la que se declara improcedente la acción de tutela de la señora Aleida Gelves Laguado y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela que ha dado origen al presente fallo.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la A.R.S. COOPSOSALUD LTDA., Seccional Arauca, que en el término de 48 horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de esta providencia, deberá realizar, si no lo ha hecho ya, el examen ordenado por el médico tratante.
  3. Tercero. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.