JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 13, 1999

T-678 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Gerardo Gonzalez Rozo

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Minimo Vital. Mora En El Pago De Salarios. Antares Editores S.A. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Trabajador
  • Pago oportuno de salarios a extrabajador desempleado sin otro ingreso económico
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR, el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., del 6 de abril de 1999, y en su lugar TUTELAR el derecho fundamental al mínimo vital.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la empresa Canal Ramírez Antares Editores S.A., para que en el plazo máximo de cinco (5) días, contados a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia, se asegure de cancelar lo adeudado al señor Gerardo González Rozo.
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  4. Décimo. Laboral del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., verificar el efectivo cumplimiento de la orden dada en el numeral anterior.
  5. Cuarto. ADVERTIR al representante legal de la empresa aquí demandada, que de no cumplir con la orden aquí impuesta se hará acreedor a las sanciones contempladas en el artículo 52 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  6. Quinto. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.