JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 11, 1998

T-646 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jose Bernardo Panche Sanchez Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Reclamar Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Flota Mercante. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Subsidiariedad
  • Improcedencia general para reclamar pago de acreencias laborales
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Legalidad de suspensión de contratos
  • Declaración de subsistencia de vínculo laboral
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las siguientes sentencias proferidas por la Corte Suprema de Justicia (21 de abril de 1998) en el expediente T-165151; Juzgado Treinta y Cinco Penal Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogota (abril 20 de 1998) en el expediente T-166085; Juzgado Cuarenta y ocho penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota (mayo 22 de 1998) en el expediente T-170033; Juzgado Veintinueve Penal del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota (mayo 28 de 1998) en el expediente T-170538; Juzgado Cuarenta y nueve penal del Circuito de Santa Fe Bogota, (mayo 15 de 1998) en el expediente T-170042.
  2. Segundo. LIBRENSE por Secretaria las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591, para los efectos alli previstos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.