JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 3, 1997

T-644 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Jesus Evergito Tenorio Ortega

✓
Topic · hard data
Legitimacion De Personero Para Interponer Tutela. Responsabilidad Del Ejercito. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Seguridad Social
  • Afiliación al régimen subsidiado
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Determinación de relación causa efecto
Personero Municipal En Zonas De Conflicto
  • Legitimación para instaurar tutela
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones anotadas en la parte motiva, las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil Municipal de Ipiales el 9 de abril de 1997, y por el Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de la misma localidad, el día 22 de mayo de 1997.
  4. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde Municipal de San Andrés de Tumaco la inclusión del nombre del actor dentro de la población subsidiada, para que reciba, en calidad de no aportante, los beneficios de la seguridad social previstos en la ley.
  5. Tercero. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al Juez
  6. Primero. Civil Municipal de Ipiales, para los efectos contemplados en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  7. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.