JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 1997

T-631 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Jacobo Arturo Amador Y Otra.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticio. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension Gracia. Cajanal Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Resolución oportuna y de fondo
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas en primera instancia por el Juzgado Catorce Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla del 16 de junio de 1997 y por la Sala Civil-Familia del Tribunal Superior de esa misma ciudad del 26 de julio del ano en curso.. En su lugar CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de peticion de los senores Jacobo Arturo Amador Henriquez y Clara Helena Herazo Fernandez.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social -Cajanal- Seccional Atlantico, o a la oficina correspondiente para que en el termino de ocho (8) dias contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, proceda a resolver de fondo e integramente sobre la peticion ante ella elevada por los senores Jacobo Arturo Amador Henriquez y Clara Helena Herazo Fernandez, a menos que ya lo hubiere realizado.
  3. Tercero. PREVENIR a la Subdireccion de Prestaciones Economicas de CAJANAL para que en el futuro se abstenga de realizar los actos como los que dieron lugar a la presente accion de tutela.
  4. Cuarto. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.