JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 1997

T-629 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Ruth Maria Barranco Torres.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension Gracia. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Magdalena del 23 de junio de 1997. En su lugar CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental de peticion de la senora Ruth Maria Barranco Torres.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social -Cajanal- Seccional Magdalena, o a la oficina correspondiente para que en el termino de ocho (8) dias contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia si aun no lo ha hecho, proceda a resolver de fondo e integramente sobre la peticion ante ella elevada por la senora Ruth Maria Barranco Torres.
  3. Tercero. ADVIERTESE a la Subdireccion de Prestaciones Economicas de CAJANAL que no puede seguir violando en la forma en que lo viene haciendo el derecho fundamental de peticion de quienes a ella acuden.
  4. Cuarto. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.