JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 16, 2000

T-589 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Ana Rosa Leal Cortes

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Seguridad Social Y Vida Digna. Accion De Tutela Como Mecanismo Idoneo Para El Pago Del Bono Pensional. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bono Pensional
  • Procedencia de tutela para reclamar la remisión
  • Traslado
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decisión proferida por la Sala de Casación Civil Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia del seis (6) de diciembre de mil novecientos noventa y nueve (1999).
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela por el derecho a la seguridad social, a la vida digna y al mínimo vital de la señora Ana Rosa Leal Cortes. ORDENAR a la Alcaldía de Frontino, si no lo ha hecho ya, la cancelación del bono pensional dentro de los quince (15) días siguientes a la notificación de este fallo. En caso de no contar con la debida disponibilidad presupuestal, el mismo término se concede para adelantar las gestiones tendientes a obtener los recursos necesarios para adelantar el pago del bono mencionado.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista por el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.