JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 25, 2002

T-569 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Nohora Graciela Garavito Vargas Vs. Alcalde De Siachoque Boyaca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Vida Igualdad Y Seguridad Social De Docente. Solicitud Afiliacion Al Fondo De Prestaciones Sociales Del Magisterio. Trato Discriminatorio. Ley 715 De 2001. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Igualdad Entre Docentes
  • Afiliación al fondo de prestaciones sociales del Magisterio
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Tunja el día tres (3) de mayo de 2002. En su lugar CONCEDER la tutela por violación del derecho a la igualdad.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde Municipal de Siachoque (Boyacá), para que en el término de sesenta (60) días contados a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia, culmine los trámites necesarios para lograr la afiliación de la señora Nohora Graciela Garavito Vargas al Fondo Nacional de Prestaciones Sociales del Magisterio, atendiendo las normas vigentes sobre la materia y las regulaciones que de la ley 715 de 2001 se hagan al respecto.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.