JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 28, 1997

T-544 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Clara Ines Monsalve Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Sustitucion Pensional. Der. A La Vida Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca y el Consejo de Estado, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia. En consecuencia, ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social CAJANAL que en el término improrrogable de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de este fallo resuelva, si aún no lo ha hecho, de fondo y en todos sus aspectos, positiva o negativamente, la solicitud de sustitución pensional formulada por el abogado Francisco Guillermo Monsalve Estrada, en representación de Clara Inés, Miguel Angel y Samuel Monsalve Barreneche.
  2. Tercero. REMÍTASE copia del expediente y de este fallo al Procurador General de la Nación para lo de su cargo.
  3. Cuarto. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.