JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 8, 2000

T-516 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Miguel Camacho

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Vida. No Suministro De Audifonos Por E.P.S. No Se Advierte Vulneracion De Los Derechos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inaplicacion De Normas Del Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Exclusión de tratamientos y medicamentos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del ocho (8) de noviembre de 1999, proferida por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito de Bucaramanga.
  2. Segundo. PREVENIR a la empresa Solsalud E.P.S. Seccional Bucaramanga, para que prosiga con el tratamiento que segun diagnosticos medicos, necesite el demandante para el manejo de su discapacidad auditiva.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.