JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 14, 2001

T-499 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Sandra Felisa Muñoz Bravo Vs. Director Del Hospital Universitario De San Jose De Popayan

✓
Topic · hard data
Dferecho Al Salario Y Pago Oportuno. No Hay Afectacion Del Minimo Vital Ni Prueba De La Falta De Subsistencia De La Accionante Y Sus Padres. El Accionado Ya Cancelo Lo Debido. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por pago de acreencias laborales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Popayan, de 15 de septiembre de 2000, que nego la tutela interpuesta por Sandra Felisa Munoz Bravo contra el director del Hospital Universitario de San Jose, de Popayan, en virtud de haberse superado el hecho que la motivo.
  3. Segundo. Librense por Secretaria General, las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.