JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 29, 1993

T-495 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Ana Cecilia Ortiz

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Particulares. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Terminacion De Contrato. Maternidad. Arquidiocesis De Bta. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de esta sentencia a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota, al Juzgado Sesenta y Tres Penal del Circuito de esta ciudad, a la Arquidiocesis de Bogota, al Defensor del Pueblo y a la peticionaria de la tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.