T-476 de 2009
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
✓Claimant Luz Marleny Ruiz Castaño·Respondent Coomeva Eps
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Hecho superado en caso que se autorizó práctica de examen médico
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Derecho a la salud invocado por afiliada a quien, en un primer intento, le fue rechaza la solicitud de autorizacion del procedimiento de mamografía prescrito por medico tratante. <br>toda vez que en el tramite de revision de la tutela se logro verificar la satisfaccion de la pretension, se declaro la carencia actual de objeto. <br>
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto, por existir un hecho superado.
- Segundo. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 26 Penal del Circuito el 4 de marzo de 2009, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
- Tercero. LIBRESE por Secretaria General, la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.