JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 20, 1996

T-465A de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Rosalba Gutierrez Soto

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Reconocimiento De Pension De Jubilacion. Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de tres (3) de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Décimo. Penal Municipal de Medellín.
  3. Segundo. En su lugar, CONCEDER la acción de tutela del derecho fundamental de petición de la señora Rosalba Gutiérrez Soto, ordenando a la Caja Nacional de Previsión Social, que dentro del término de 48 horas, contados a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia, resuelva la solicitud de reconocimiento y pago de la pensión de jubilación, presentada por la señora Rosalba Gutiérrez Soto, si para la fecha de esta decisión no lo ha hecho.
  4. Tercero. COMUNICAR a través de Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado
  5. Décimo. Penal Municipal de Medellín.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.