JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 6, 1992

T-445 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Simon Rodriguez Rodriguez

✓Claimant Marceliano Corrales

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Recusacion. Impedimento. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia de el 17 de febrero de 1992 en el caso de petición de tutela presentada por el Capitán de Corbeta (r.) Marceliano Corrales Larrarte, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva.
  2. Segundo. Comuníquese la presente decisión al Despacho judicial de origen para que sea notificada conforme lo dispone el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Envíese copia de esta providencia al Juzgado de primera instancia para la Armada Nacional y al Tribunal Penal Militar.
  4. COMUNIQUESE Y
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.