JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 18, 1996

T-441 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Cervelion Otero Estela

✓
Topic · hard data
Suspension De Pago De Pension. Inexistencia De Perjuicio Irremediable. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pensión compartida
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR La sentencia proferida dentro del expediente T-98.649 por el Juzgado 38 Penal Municipal de Cali, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 38 Penal Municipal de Cali, a las Empresas Municipales de Cali EMCALI y al peticionario de la presenta accion de tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.