JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 17, 2001

T-384 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Roberto Soto Perez Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad Al Trabajo Y A La Irrenunciabilidad De Los Derechos Laborales. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago De Cesantias. Procedencia De La Tute La Para El Pago De Cesantias Laborales. Transito De Un Sistema Legal A Otro No Puede Implicar Discrim
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Discriminación por tránsito de legislación respecto pago de cesantías parciales
  • Discriminación por razón del régimen prestacional
  • Discriminación entre empleados judiciales por régimen de cesantías parciales
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el 15 de agosto de 2000, por la Sala Civil de Decision del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibague contra el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico y la Direccion Seccional de la Administracion Judicial con base en las consideraciones aqui expuestas.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.