JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 31, 1995

T-336 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Maria Margarita Parra Ruiz

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Der. A La Igualdad. Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Resolver Asuntos De Otra Jurisdiccion. Filiacion Extramatrimonial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

7 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia de fecha 13 de marzo de 1995, de la Sala de Conjueces del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Tunja, y en su lugar DENEGAR la acción de tutela interpuesta por María Margarita Parra Ruiz contra la sentencia de fecha 31 de mayo de 1994, proferida por la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior de Tunja.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.