JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 3, 1998

T-326 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Raul A. Gonzalez Huertas

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Discriminacion En La Seleccion De Estudiantes A Instituciones De Educacion Superior. Icfes. Universidad Distrital. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Igualdad En Acceso A Educacion Superior
  • Beneficiarios de convención colectiva y distinciones
  • Criterio de selección debe ser el académico
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución Nacional,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado 18 Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., dictada en primera instancia el 10 de diciembre de 1997 y por medio de la cual se negó la acción de tutela iniciada por Raúl Antonio González Huertas contra la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
  4. Segundo. TUTELAR el derecho a la igualdad del demandante y ordenar a la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas que lo admita y matricule en la carrera de Ingeniería Industrial, para el
  5. segundo. período académico de 1998.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.