JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 10, 2003

T-309 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Carmen Alicia Ballestas Bolaños Vs. Universidad Libre De Colombia Barranquilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Honra Buen Nombre Debido Proceso Disciplinario Defensa Y Educacion. Imposicion Sanciones Por Institucion De Educacion Superior. Falta Calidad De Bachiller. Requisitos Para Obtener Titulo De Abogado. Competencia De Particular Que Presta Servi
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Abogado
  • Cumplimiento de requisitos legales para obtener título
Carrera De Derecho
  • Invalidación por comprobarse que al momento de iniciarla no tenía grado de bachiller, ni había presentado prueba del Estado
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. LEVANTAR la suspension del termino decretada para decidir el presente asunto.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia emitida por la Sala de decision penal del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla el 6 de mayo de 2002, en virtud de la accion promovida por Carmen Alicia Ballestas Bolanos contra la Universidad Libre - Seccional Barranquilla.
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR que, por la Secretaria General se de cumplimiento a lo previsto en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.