JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 18, 1996

T-265 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant M.M.

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Educacion. Conflicto Entre Los Padres Para Decidir El Tipo De Educacion De Sus Hijos. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Controversia de padres sobre educación de menor
Divorcio
  • Padres escogen la educación del menor
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pereira, Sala de Familia, de fecha 4 de diciembre de 1995. En consecuencia, Nno procede la tutela solicitada por la señora M.M. contra el señor P.P.
  2. Segundo. Para la publicación de esta providencia, se suprimirán los nombres del menor y de sus padres, para proteger los derechos a la intimidad del
  3. primero.
  4. Tercero. Comuníquese esta decisión al Juzgado
  5. Tercero. de Familia de Pereira, para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.