JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 17, 1995

T-220 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jose Cuesta Novoa Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Ambiente Sano. Der. A La Salud. Acciones Populares. Falta De Relacion De Causalidad. Contaminacion. Puente Aranda. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR la providencia de fecha veinte (20) de octubre de 1994, mediante la cual el Juzgado
  4. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá resolvió denegar la tutela interpuesta por los ciudadanos José Cuesta Novoa y Milciades Ramírez Melo.
  5. Segundo. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, se comunique esta providencia al Juzgado
  6. Octavo. Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  7. Tercero. ENVIAR copia de esta providencia al Ministerio del Medio Ambiente y al Departamento Administrativo del Medio Ambiente de Santafé de Bogotá (DAMA), para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.