JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 22, 2001

T-208 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Martha Luz D´leon Naar Vs. Clinica Nuestra Señora De Los Remedios De Cali Y Otras

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Vida Domicilio Y Libertad De Locomocion De Persona De La Tercera Edad. Retencion Hospitalaria. Legitimidad. Solicitud Examen De Cateterismo Cardiaco. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Agencia Oficiosa En Tutela
  • Legitimidad e interés
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por falta de pruebas
Establecimiento Hospitalario
  • No puede retener a paciente por estar pendiente cuenta de cobro
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Controversia sobre responsabilidad económica en costos hospitalarios
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmar la sentencia de fecha veintiuno (21) de septiembre del año dos mil (2000), del Juzgado
  2. Décimo. Penal del Circuito de Cali, en la acción de tutela presentada por Martha Luz D´León Naar, agente oficiosa de Natalia Inés Naar Benedetti, contra la Clínica Nuestra Señora de los Remedios de Cali, Cajanal, Seccional Valle, y Cosmitet Ltda.
  3. Por Secretaría General líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.