T-1569 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz
✓Claimant Deyanira Lozada Ardila Vs Colegio Cardenal Sancha
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Elementos fácticos que deben demostrarse para el reintegro
- Información oportuna al empleador
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. Confirmar los fallos proferidos por los Juzgados 49 Penal Municipal y 15 Penal del Circuito de Bogotá, mediante los cuales se negó la protección de los derechos invocados por la accionante, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
- Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.