JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 21, 2000

T-1560 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Martha Hidalgo Ballesteros Vs. Municipio De Anza

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Seguridad Social Y Debido Proceso. Solicitud Bono Pensional. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital
  • Alcance
  • No afectación para el caso
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Solicitud pago de bono pensional
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, del 9 de junio de 2000 que nego la presente accion de tutela.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.