JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 14, 2000

T-1530 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Miguel Adriano Alvarez Delgado Vs. Hospital San Juan De Dios De Pamplona

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo Igualdad Seguridad Social Y Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Partida Presupuestal
  • Pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales
Entidad Publica
  • Pago oportuno de pensiones
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Apropiación presupuestal
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Tribunal Superior de Pamplona, Sala Civil-Familia-Laboral y por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, el 19 de julio y el 7 de septiembre del presente año, respectivamente.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por el señor Miguel Adriano Alvarez Delgado contra el Hospital San Juan de Dios de Pamplona. En consecuencia se ordena al gerente de la mencionada entidad, que dentro de los cinco (5) días siguientes a la notificación de esta providencia, si todavía no lo ha hecho, cancele las mesadas pensionales que le adeuda al demandante.
  3. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.