JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 12, 2000

T-1388 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Sara Gomez Velasquez Vs. Departamento Del Magdalena

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Docente De La Escuela "madre Luna". Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Trabajador
  • Improcedencia de tutela por no afectación
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia general para reclamar pago de acreencias laborales
Empleador
  • Falta de presupuesto o insolvencia para pago oportuno de salarios no es razón suficiente
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 4 Penal Municipal de Santa Marta, el doce (12) de mayo de 2000, en la acción de tutela instaurada por Sara Gómez Velásquez en contra del departamento del Magdalena, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  2. Segundo. PREVÉNGASE al Gobernador del Departamento del Magdalena para que adopte con carácter permanente los correctivos presupuestales que sean necesarios para asegurar el cumplimiento idóneo de las obligaciones laborales a su cargo.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.