JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 10, 2001

T-1329 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Guillermo Nannetti Valencia Vs. Consejo Nacional Electoral.·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A Fundar Partidos Y Movimientos Politicos. Negativa De Accionada A Conceder Personeria Juridica A Movimiento Politico. Limitacion Derecho Politico En Epoca Preelectoral Conlleva Perjuicio Irremediable. Titularidad Y Alcance De Derecho A Construir
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A Fundar Partidos Y Movimientos Politicos
  • No se desconoce cuando se niega reconocimiento de personería jurídica a los que son idénticos
  • Límites
Derecho A Elegir En Una Democracia Participativa
  • Claridad y transparencia en las opciones políticas
Movimientos Politicos
  • Firmas de apoyo deben ser manifestación de voluntad informada
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 17 de mayo de 2001 por la Seccion Segunda, Subseccion B, de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, en el proceso de la accion de tutela de Guillermo Nannetti Valencia contra el Consejo Nacional Electoral.
  2. Segundo. Librar, por medio de la Secretaria General, las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991. El fallo se comunicara tambien a la Seccion Segunda, Subseccion B, de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.