JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 22, 1996

T-123 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Zamir Eduardo Silva Amin

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia Del Recurso De Suplica Contra Sent. De La Secc. 5 Del Consejo De Estado Antes De La <a Href=../1996/C-005-96.Rtf> C-005/96</A>. Inexistencia De Via De Hecho. Negada. Ver Auto 021/96.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Via De Hecho
  • Inexistencia por inexequibilidad posterior de norma
Excepcion De Inconstitucionalidad
  • No aplicación frente a inexequibilidad posterior de norma
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 26 de octubre de 1995 proferida por la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que a su vez acogio la del 26 de septiembre de 1995 de la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRAR las comunicaciones a que se refiere el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli previstos
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJulio Cesar Ortiz Gutiérrez
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.