JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 3, 2004

T-1208 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Gerardo Muñoz Olaya Vs. Secretaria De Gobierno De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Dignidad Humana La Igualdad Trabajo Y A La Familia De Exfuncionario De La Secretaria De Gobierno Que Padece Paraplejia Total De Extremidades Inferiores Retirado Del Servicio Por Haber Llegado A La Edad De Retiro Forzoso. Solicita Se Inaplique
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por los juzgados 32 Penal Municipal de Bogota, D.C., y 12 Penal del Circuito de la misma ciudad y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la accion de tutela incoada por Gerardo Munoz Olaya.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria de Hacienda de Bogota D.C., que, en el termino maximo de cinco (5) dias, contados a partir de la notificacion de esta sentencia, emita el bono pensional de Gerardo Munoz Olaya y que lo remita de manera inmediata al Seguro Social. ORDENAR al Seguro Social que una vez recepcionado el documento anterior, y dentro del termino maximo de cinco (5) dias siguientes a su recibo, reconozca efectivamente la pension del accionante.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.