JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 4, 2000

T-1157 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Eduardo Ocampo Charry Vs. Bancafe Panama S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad. Contrato De Mutuo Con Hipoteca. Solicitud De Dacion En Pago De Inmueble Hipotecado En Garantia De Un Prestamo De Vivienda. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria el 30 de marzo del 2000, y por el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria, el 19 de marzo del mismo año, dentro de la acción de tutela instaurada por Eduardo Ocampo Charry contra Bancafé Panamá S.A.
  2. SEGUNDO. TUTELAR el derecho a la igualdad a Eduardo Ocampo Charry. En consecuencia se ordena a Bancafé Panamá, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas proceda a darle cumplimiento al artículo 14 del decreto 2331 de 1998, tramitando y aceptando la oferta de dación en pago propuesta por el actor.
  3. TERCERO. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 de Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.