JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 28, 2003

T-1140 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jorge Lloyd Arcos Moncayo Vs. Alcalde Municipal De Buesaco - Nariño

✓
Topic · hard data
Vida Digna Y Minimo Vital De Pensionado. Solicitud Pago Completo Mesada Pensional. Entidad Que Renoce Pension Obligada Al Pago Completo Mesada. Puede Repetir A Otras Entidades. Tramite Pago De Una Cuota Parte Mesada No Incumbe Al Pensionado. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Pension De Jubilacion
  • Trámite para lograr el pago completo de la mesada le corresponde a la entidad que la reconoció no al pensionado
  • Pago completo de la mesada
Derecho Al Minimo Vital
  • Afirmación sobre su afectación debe tenerse como un hecho probado
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la sentencia proferida por el Juez Promiscuo Municipal de Buesaco el 25 de junio de 2003.
  2. Segundo. Tutelar los derechos fundamentales a la vida digna y al mínimo vital de Jorge Lloyd Arcos Moncayo.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar a la Alcaldía Municipal de Buesaco el pago de la mesada pensional completa que le corresponde a Jorge Lloyd Arcos Moncayo.
  4. Cuarto. Requerir a la Defensoría del Pueblo Regional Nariño para que le preste al actor la asesoría que requiere con miras a la obtención del pago de los saldos pendientes de las mesadas pensionales ya causadas.
  5. Quinto. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.