JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 8, 2004

T-1111 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Edgar Lombana Trujillo Y Otra Vs. Tribunal Superior De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso En Procedimiento Verbal De Mayor Cuantia Contra El Banco Andino En Liquidación Por Anatocismo Al Inaplicar La Sancion Imponible Y Atenerse A Una Resolución Del Banco De La Republica. Solicita Se Ordene A La Sala Civil Del Tribuna
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Improcedencia por no existir vía de hecho
Credito Para Vivienda
  • Financiación y regulación especial
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 1deg de julio de 2004, que declaro improcedente el amparo dentro de la accion de tutela incoada por Edgar Lombana Trujillo y Ana Cristina Sierra de Lombana contra la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, con citacion oficiosa del Banco Andino Colombia S.A. en Liquidacion; pero por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. DAR por secretaria cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.