JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 9, 2002

T-1110 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Universidad Autonoma Del Caribe Vs. Secretaria De Planeacion Distrital De Barranquilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso Y Educacion. Via De Hecho. Solicitud Licencia De Construccion E Instalacion Antena De Television. Curaduria Urbana. Aplicacion Normas Juridicas. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales O Actos Administrativos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acto Administrativo
  • Apoyo en normas urbanísticas
Licencia De Construccion
  • Antena de televisión en Universidad
Via De Hecho
  • Clases de defectos en la actuación
Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Inexistencia de perjuicio irremediable
Controversia Juridica
  • Interpretación de disposiciones contenidas en un mismo estatuto
Jurisdiccion Contencioso Administrativa
  • Competencia para dirimir interpretación de disposiciones contenidas en un mismo estatuto
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Consejo de Estado el 22 de agosto de 2002, en la accion de tutela interpuesta por la Universidad Autonoma del Caribe contra la Secretaria de Planeacion Distrital de Barranquilla.
  2. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.