JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 15, 2010

T-1051 de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Luz Helena Salazar Rodas·Respondent Instituto Seccional De Salud Del Quindio Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por suministro de medicamentos cardioprotectores para quimioterapia
Juez De Tutela
  • Caso en que se llama la atención por cuanto no podía negar la tutela por una omisión en el trámite administrativo para solicitar medicamentos
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Salud, vida digna.

La accionante solicita la entrega del medicamento Infliximab Remicade el cual no le ha sido suministrado por no encontrarse cubierto dentro del POS.

La Sala encuentra que frente al caso en concreto existe un hecho superado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Por existir un hecho superado, CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Armenia, de 4 de agosto de 2010, mediante la cual se nego la proteccion solicitada por la demandante Luz Helena Salazar Rodas.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.