JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 3, 2001

T-1045 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Maria Sandra Cruz Perdomo Vs. Inversiones Rescol S.A.·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Trabajo Vida Y Minimo Vital De Mujer Embarazada. Terminacion Unilateral Del Contrato De Trabajo. Solicitud Pago Indemnizacion Por Despido Sin Justa Causa. Existencia De Otro Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia indemnización por despido de mujer embarazada
  • No es la vía para definición de existencia y cuantía de obligaciones en dinero
Mujer Trabajadora Embarazada
  • Hecho notorio
  • Despido por causa del embarazo
Mujer Embarazada
  • Protección constitucional especial
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Definición de existencia y cuantía de obligaciones en dinero
  • Indemnización por despido de mujer embarazada
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Once de Familia de Bogota, de mayo 7 de 2001 que nego la tutela solicitada por la senora Maria Sandra Cruz Perdomo, con base en las consideraciones aqui expuestas.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.