JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 25, 2000

T-045 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Oscar Villada Garcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Acto Administrativo Del Ministerio De Hacienda Que Ejecuta Lo Resuelto En Sentencia De La Seccion Segunda Del Consejo De Estado. Reintegro Al Cargo Por Declaratoria De Inconstitucionalidad Del Dec 1660/91. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia Del Consejo De Estado
  • Inconformidad con ejecución en cuanto a reintegro y pago de salarios
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de junio 30 de 1999, pero por las razones expuestas en la presente Sentencia y en consecuencia;
  2. SEGUNDO. DENEGAR el amparo solicitado por Oscar Villada Garcia contra el Ministerio de Hacienda presuntamente vulnerado mediante la expedicion de la Resolucion 1741 de julio 21 de 1998.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.