JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 4, 1993

T-030 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Sociedad Non Plus Ultra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Propiedad Y A La No Confiscacion De Bienes Embargados. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia -Sala de Casacion Civil-, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta Sentencia.
  2. Segundo. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, ENVIAR copia de esta Sentencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota -Sala de Decision Civil-, al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, al Juzgado 11 Civil del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, a la Sociedad Non Plus Ultra Ltda y al Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal.
  4. Tercero. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, ENVIAR copia de la Sentencia a la Fiscalia General de la Nacion y a la Procuraduria Delegada para la Vigilancia Judicial, para lo de su competencia, de conformidad con lo aqui expuesto en el acapite 2.4., relativo a las pruebas practicadas por la Corte Constitucional, literal c).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.