JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 25, 2013

T-029A de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Ana Mercedes Martinez Gomez·Respondent Fiduciaria La Previsora Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Convencion Colectiva Suscrita Entre El Iss Y Sintraseguridad Social
  • Precedente fijado en sentencia SU897 de 2012, en cuanto a la vigencia de la convención
Accion De Tutela Para Obtener Pension Convencional De Jubilacion
  • Improcedencia por existir otro medio de defensa judicial y no se demostró perjuicio irremediable
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Aduce la actora que las entidades demandadas vulneraron sus derechos fundamentales a la vida digna, a la seguridad social, a la salud, a la igualdad y al mínimo vital, al negarle el reconocimiento y pago de la pensión de jubilación que considera tener derecho, bajo el argumento de no cumplir con los requisitos del Decreto 1653 de 1977 o el régimen de transición establecido en el artículo 36 de la Ley 100 de 1993.

La Sala decide confirmar la decisión de instancia que declaró IMPROCEDENTE el amparo deprecado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo dictado en julio 9 de 2012 por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, Sala Penal, mediante el cual fue declarado improcedente el amparo impetrado por la senora Ana Mercedes Martinez Gomez.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, LIBRESE la comunicacion a que alude el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.