JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 27, 1997

T-024 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Antonio Agustin Salas Yoli

✓
Topic · hard data
Prestaciones Asistenciales Del Ejercito Nal. Indemnizacion. Sus Dolencias No Son Consecuencia Del Servicio Militar. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Ciudadano
  • Cuidado de la salud
Acción De Tutela
  • No reemplaza recursos no ejercidos
Ejercito Nacional
  • Cubrimiento dolencias producto del servicio militar
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Impugnación acta de junta médica
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones de esta providencia, la sentencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria, de fecha siete (7) de junio de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), la cual confirmó el fallo de la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Distrito Capital, de fecha veintinueve (29) de abril de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), providencia que, a su vez, denegó la tutela solicitada por Antonio Agustín Salas Yoli.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR esta providencia a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Distrito Capital, para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.