JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 17, 1994

T-005 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Cesar Alberto Mendoza

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Propiedad. Derecho De Peticion. Escritura Sin Firma Del Notario. Existencia De Otro Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia
Notario
  • Funciones
Escritura Publica
  • Suscripción
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Eficacia
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de esta ciudad, Sala Civil, del 27 de julio de 1993. En consecuencia, no se concede la tutela demandada por el señor CESAR ALBERTO MENDOZA SEYFFARTH.
  2. Segundo. Enviar copia del presente expediente a la Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro para lo de su competencia.
  3. Tercero. Comunicar la presente decisión al Juzgado 18 Civil del Circuito de esta ciudad, para que sea notificada a las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Jorge Arango Mejía
Reporting justice
✓
Antonio Barrera Carbonell
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 4 →T-005/94T-1752/00 — Derecho A La Igualdad Seguridad Social Trabajo Y Dignidad Humana. Pension De Jubilacion Como Magistrados. Homologacion. Igualdad Y Cambio De · cited 131 timesT-1752/002000T-661/12 · cited 33 timesT-661/122012SU.949/14 · cited 27 timesSU.949/142014T-022/01 — Derecho De Peticion Seguridad Social Igualdad Proteccion Y Asistencia De Personas De La Tercera Edad. Solicitud Reajuste Retroactivo Pension · cited 10 timesT-022/012001
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by4

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.